CO129-281 - Governor Sir Robinson & Acting Governor Major Gen Black - 1898 [1-3] — Page 23

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

gratuity in respect of her

deceased husband's services in that Department.

Mrs Nolan on retirement from the service

2.

on

on her

the 11th January, 1897, received a gratuity of $597 under Rule I (4) of the Pension Minute, the grant of which was formally approved as per your despatch "N:54" of the 17th March last,

One of her sons is employed in the service of this Government as a student Interpreter at a salary of $1,200 per annum, and the other is, as stated by Petitioner, serving as an apprentice in the Naval Yard.

3.

Petitioner's case differs from those quoted in her memorial in that the widows of the officers there referred to, not having been in Government employ, received no gratuity and

has been rewritten to meet the requirements as follows:

gratuity in respect of her

deceased husband's services in that Department.

Mrs Nolan on retirement from the service

2.

on her

the 11th January, 1897, received a gratuity of $597 under Rule I(4) of the Pension Minute, the grant of which was formally approved as per your despatch "N:54" of the 17th March last,

One of her sons is employed in the service of this Government as a student Interpreter at a salary of $1,200 per annum, and the other is, as stated by Petitioner, serving as an apprentice in the Naval Yard.

3.

Petitioner's case differs from those quoted in her memorial in that the widows of the officers there referred to, not having been in Government employ, received no gratuity and

However, to follow the exact output format required (HTML using

for paragraphs), the corrected version should be:

gratuity in respect of her

deceased husband's services in that Department.

Mrs Nolan on retirement from the service

2.

on her

the 11th January, 1897, re-ceived has been corrected to "received" a gratuity of $597 under Rule I(4) of the Pension Minute, the grant of which was formally approved as per your despatch "N:54" of the 17th March last,

One of her sons is employed in the service of this Government as a student Interpreter at a salary of $1,200 per annum, and the other is, as stated by Petitioner, serving as an apprentice in the Naval Yard.

3.

Petitioner's case differs from those quoted in her memorial in that the widows of the officers there referred to, not having been in Government employ, received no gratuity and

The final output is:

gratuity in respect of her

deceased husband's services in that Department.

Mrs Nolan on retirement from the service

2.

on her

the 11th January, 1897, received a gratuity of $597 under Rule I(4) of the Pension Minute, the grant of which was formally approved as per your despatch "N:54" of the 17th March last,

One of her sons is employed in the service of this Government as a student Interpreter at a salary of $1,200 per annum, and the other is, as stated by Petitioner, serving as an apprentice in the Naval Yard.

3.

Petitioner's case differs from those quoted in her memorial in that the widows of the officers there referred to, not having been in Government employ, received no gratuity and

Edit History

2026-05-30 12:53:25 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
gratuity in respect of her deceased husband's services in that Department. Mrs Nolan on retirement from the service 2. on on her the 11th January, 1897, received a gratuity of $597 under Rule I (4) of the Pension Minute, the grant of which was formally approved as per your despatch "N:54" of the 17th March last, One of her sons is employed in the service of this Government as a student Interpreter at a salary of $1,200 per annum, and the other is, as stated by Petitioner, serving as an apprentice in the Naval Yard. 3. Petitioner's case differs from those quoted in her memorial in that the widows of the officers there referred to, not having been in Government employ, received no gratuity and has been rewritten to meet the requirements as follows: gratuity in respect of her deceased husband's services in that Department. Mrs Nolan on retirement from the service 2. on her the 11th January, 1897, received a gratuity of $597 under Rule I(4) of the Pension Minute, the grant of which was formally approved as per your despatch "N:54" of the 17th March last, One of her sons is employed in the service of this Government as a student Interpreter at a salary of $1,200 per annum, and the other is, as stated by Petitioner, serving as an apprentice in the Naval Yard. 3. Petitioner's case differs from those quoted in her memorial in that the widows of the officers there referred to, not having been in Government employ, received no gratuity and However, to follow the exact output format required (HTML using for paragraphs), the corrected version should be: gratuity in respect of her deceased husband's services in that Department. Mrs Nolan on retirement from the service 2. on her the 11th January, 1897, re-ceived has been corrected to "received" a gratuity of $597 under Rule I(4) of the Pension Minute, the grant of which was formally approved as per your despatch "N:54" of the 17th March last, One of her sons is employed in the service of this Government as a student Interpreter at a salary of $1,200 per annum, and the other is, as stated by Petitioner, serving as an apprentice in the Naval Yard. 3. Petitioner's case differs from those quoted in her memorial in that the widows of the officers there referred to, not having been in Government employ, received no gratuity and The final output is: gratuity in respect of her deceased husband's services in that Department. Mrs Nolan on retirement from the service 2. on her the 11th January, 1897, received a gratuity of $597 under Rule I(4) of the Pension Minute, the grant of which was formally approved as per your despatch "N:54" of the 17th March last, One of her sons is employed in the service of this Government as a student Interpreter at a salary of $1,200 per annum, and the other is, as stated by Petitioner, serving as an apprentice in the Naval Yard. 3. Petitioner's case differs from those quoted in her memorial in that the widows of the officers there referred to, not having been in Government employ, received no gratuity and
Baseline (Original)
gratuity in respect of her deceased husband's services in that Department. Mrs Nolan on retirement from the service 2. on on her the 11th January, 1897, re- ceived a gratuity of $597 under Rule I (4) of the~ Pension Minute, the grant which was of a proved in formally ap your despatch "N:54 of the 17th March last, One of her sons is her sons is employ- ed in the service of this Government 772577 18 Government as a student Interpreter at a salary of $1,200 per annum, and the other is, as stated by Petitioner, serving the as an- apprentice in the Naval Yard. 3. Petitioner's case fers from those quoted dif in her memorial in that the in widows of the officers there referred to, not having been in Government employ, received no gratuity and
2026-05-30 12:53:25 · Baseline
View content

gratuity in respect of her

deceased husband's services in that Department.

Mrs Nolan on retirement from the service

2.

on

on her

the 11th January, 1897, re- ceived a gratuity of $597 under Rule I (4) of the~ Pension Minute, the grant

which was

of

a proved in

formally ap your despatch

"N:54 of the 17th March last,

One of her sons is

her sons is employ-

ed in the service of this

Government

772577

18

Government as a student Interpreter at a salary of $1,200 per annum, and the

other is, as stated by Petitioner, serving

the

as an-

apprentice in the Naval

Yard.

3.

Petitioner's case

fers from those quoted

dif

in

her memorial in that the

in

widows of the officers there referred to, not having been in Government employ,

received no

gratuity and

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.